7 responses to “Nike Seitiro Hi-Vis Review”

  1. barca fc

    good ball good review

  2. mikeC

    Nice ball but the price of a Nike or Adidas ball are stupid. I prefer a cheaper brand such as Lotto. Honestly, for playing at the park you could never notice a difference. It is the player, not the ball or boots that make a touch or shot good.

    1. Woldstad

      They’re for bragging rights. :)

      1. yX

        it does help.. i mean my friend has a jabulani… and BOI that ball flies like a mother****er. haha but i mean for training and stuff i dn’t think i can afford a ball like this haha =P

  3. whitecapsfc

    MikeC, i have to some what disagree about the ball comment. Boot’s dont make the player correct and i guess nor does a ball but i do find you get different results from different balls. For example try striking a jabulani, then try striking one of these balls and there is a big difference. See balls that are stitched different will give different results because of the stitching, or the way the panels are shaped. I’m not claiming to be a better player with a certain type of ball but i find i get a truer strike with some balls.

  4. Jay Mike

    Nice review guys – as always.
    I noted that your intro says that Adidas went from the Teamgeist to the Roteiro and the Jabulani. In fact, the Roteiro came first (Euro 2004), then the Teamgeist and the Jabulani in 2006 and 2010 respectively :)

    With that said, I fully agree with the review. In my opinion, the Seitiro is a much better ball than any of the last 3-4 Adidas balls, and I agree with the point about the ball having a great balance between liveliness and precision. All in all, good job Nike.

Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook